Re: [ECI-EN] Fred15 project - M1 paperwhite for PC1 coated premium - ECI-EN

19 Jun 2014

      Hello,
With the GRACoL 2013 profile, the proofs made with M1 readings were too
yellow, the proofs made with M0 readings were much better.

I read 11 different papers with M0 and M1 on and i1Pro2. The b* range for
M0 was -2.21 to -6.64 with an average of -3.98. The b* range for M1 was
-3.95 to -9.52 with an average of -6.1

Thanks,
Bret

...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

 Message: 1
 Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 17:19:12 -0400
 From: Bret Hesler &lt;bret.hesler(a)gmail.com&gt;
 Subject: Re: [ECI-EN] Fred15 project - M1 paperwhite for PC1 coated
         premium
 To: eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com
 Message-ID:
         <
 CADCjBLh+p2HrjBo6O_CvJYUEqFCJhMCXzVTS5r-2Bkrz6nV0iA(a)mail.gmail.com&gt;
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

 Hello,
 I just got an i1 Pro 2 and will be calibrating a proofer tomorrow to the
 Gracol 2013 dataset, which has the same white point and specifies M1. I
 took M1 and M0 readings of a couple papers and I agree with your findings.
 Sappi Opus is a pretty common sheet, which I have been using as a target
 for years, and reads about -4b* in M0 and -6.5b* in M1. After I complete my
 profiling tomorrow, I will report back.

 Thanks,
 Bret Hesler