Dear sender,
Please be informed that I will be out of office from 28th May to 5th June 2008. I will have limited access to my emails during the mentioned period.
For sales matter, please refer to Paul (paul(a)datajet.com.sg)
For technical matter, please contact James (james(a)datajet.com.sg)
Thank you.
With Best Regards,
Samuel LEE
Bits & Bytes Marketing Pte Ltd
Does anybody know if the profile SC Paper (ECI) I based on LWC paper or uncoated paper?
And which Screen frequency is it validated for?
/m.frank
m.frank(a)get2net.dk
Hi Sebastian A.
You promised a few weeks ago to make a report available
on the creation of "scientific" device link profile generation tools.
I requested some info on the recently released report by Swedish
experts and a possible link.
Could you be so kind to make that info available?
Thanks a lot.
Regards, Henk Gianotten
>Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 00:48:28 +0200
>To: eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com
>From: Henk Gianotten <henk(a)gianotten.com>
>Subject: Re: [ECI-EN] Swedish documentation on GCR
>
>In the Dutch graphic arts magazine Pers was an article written
>by the (famous) Swedish specialist Paul Lindström
>It appeared in the AGI magazine and was translated in Dutch.
>It covers GCR and several kinds of Device Link profiles such as
>used in Alwan, GMG, OneVision and Binuscan.
>Was Lindström involved in the project you mentioned?
>The University of Dalarna Borlänge in Sweden investigated the
>different separations and the influence of UCR and GCR.
>The report was written by Emmi Enoksson and Anders Bjorstedt
>with some help of Jan Erik Nordstrom.
>The tools Photoshop, PrintOpen and ProfileMaker.
>The conclusion:
>UCR is descrobed as reducing CMY under K.
>GCR is described as reducing amounts of CMY by K in
>gray and colors.
>Their tests proved that UCR is just a limited amount of GCR.
>They introduce just a new word for GCR: CB or "Compensation by Black".
>Same technology but different expression.
>My suggestion: Get rid of UCR and use just GCR.
>Is this research linked to your special project?
>Awaiting your documentation,
>Regards
>Henk Gianotten.
>
>At 04:15 16-4-2008 -0700, Spitfire wrote:
>
>>(snip)
>>As we speak a swedish project are researching on this "enhanced" papers.
>>Some institute and three newsprint companies are involved. Study yet not
>>published.
>>With the method I use, and if printing with full tone values that don't
>>smear, we find the best possible ink values.
>>(snip)
>>
>>I just presented this at a university where I have supervised a master
>>student in the subject. I can send the essay from this engineer for them
>>who wants it, on a personal level (email me).
>>
>>Cheers
>>A Sebastian
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Henk Gianotten, Prins Hendriklaan 58 3761 DW Soest, Netherlands
>Tel. +31 (0)35 60 12 206 Fax: +31 (0)84 73 04 497 e-mail: henk(a)gianotten.com
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I will be traveling to drupa, and wonder what people at this forum
would recomend that I do not miss.
I am struggeling with knowing where the "market" is. Understanding
colour and profiles is one thing knowing where users are at in their
understanding is another issue. Looking around the webb I also see
that (still) many discussion forums assume that RGB flows are sRGB.
Many photographers are being taught to go ProPhoto and AdobeRGB seems
to land as defacto due to the "Europe Prepress 2" settings and many
digital Cameras being able to deliver AdobeRGB, (as well as screens
proving their worth by comparing how close they get to AdobeRGB in %).
Also I struggle with workflows that do not have colourmanaged RGB,
would it be safe to assume that untagged RGB is sRGB? It would be
good to know that all would make the same assumption on untagged RGB
as assuming different things wold produce different results. Please I
would like to hear authorities on this.
respectfully
Lukas
In the Dutch graphic arts magazine Pers was an article written
by the (famous) Swedish specialist Paul Lindström
It appeared in the AGI magazine and was translated in Dutch.
It covers GCR and several kinds of Device Link profiles such as
used in Alwan, GMG, OneVision and Binuscan.
Was Lindström involved in the project you mentioned?
The University of Dalarna Borlänge in Sweden investigated the
different separations and the influence of UCR and GCR.
The report was written by Emmi Enoksson and Anders Bjorstedt
with some help of Jan Erik Nordstrom.
The tools Photoshop, PrintOpen and ProfileMaker.
The conclusion:
UCR is descrobed as reducing CMY under K.
GCR is described as reducing amounts of CMY by K in
gray and colors.
Their tests proved that UCR is just a limited amount of GCR.
They introduce just a new word for GCR: CB or "Compensation by Black".
Same technology but different expression.
My suggestion: Get rid of UCR and use just GCR.
Is this research linked to your special project?
Awaiting your documentation,
Regards
Henk Gianotten.
At 04:15 16-4-2008 -0700, Spitfire wrote:
>(snip)
>As we speak a swedish project are researching on this "enhanced" papers.
>Some institute and three newsprint companies are involved. Study yet not
>published.
>With the method I use, and if printing with full tone values that don't
>smear, we find the best possible ink values.
>(snip)
>
>I just presented this at a university where I have supervised a master
>student in the subject. I can send the essay from this engineer for them
>who wants it, on a personal level (email me).
>
>Cheers
>A Sebastian
I will be out of the office starting 25/04/2008 and will not return until
06/05/2008.
I'm currently out of the office on annual leave. I'll respond to your
message when I'm back in the office.
Your UK contacts in my absence will be -
Phil Deane
Email: philip.deane(a)rrd.com
Office: +44 (0)1423 796440
Steve Fisher
Email: stephen.fisher(a)rrd.com
Office: +44 (0)1423 796107
Many thanks,
Regards, John.
