Hello colleagues,
bvdm has published the english version MediaStandard Print 2016 as a
free download. A must have for print buyers, designers, prepress
specialists and offset printers which want to work according ISO
12647-2:2013, FOGRA51/52 and eci-profiles.
Directlink:
https://www.bvdm-online.de/fileadmin/tundf/bvdm_Mediastandard_Print_2016.pdf
Best regards
Jan-Peter Homann
www.colormanagement.de
Further background informations:
*Bundesverband Druck und Medien e.V. (bvdm)*
German Printing and Media Industries Federation (bvdm)
Öffentlichkeitsarbeit
Friedrichstraße 194-199
D-10117 Berlin
E-Mail presse(a)bvdm-online.de <mailto:presse@bvdm-online.de>
Internet www.bvdm-online.de <http://www.bvdm-online.de/>
Publikationen: www.bvdm-online.de/shop/ <http://www.bvdm-online.de/shop/>
Jetzt vormerken/jetzt anmelden:
15. Feb. – 16. Feb. Digitaldruck-Kongress 2017
<http://www.bvdm-online.de/service/veranstaltungen/digitaldruck-kongress-201…>
_Ihre Ansprechpartner_
Frau
Bettina Knape
Pressesprecherin
Telefon +49 (0) 30 / 20 91 39-171
Telefax +49 (0) 30 / 20 91 39-113
Email _bk(a)bvdm-online.de <mailto:bk@bvdm-online.de>___
__
Herr
Wolf Witte
Referent Öffentlichkeitsarbeit
Telefon +49 (0) 30 / 20 91 39-172
Telefax +49 (0) 30 / 20 91 39-113
Email _ww(a)bvdm-online.de <mailto:ww@bvdm-online.de>___
to anyone:
https://www.fogra.org/en/fogra-research/wc-digital-printing/technical-commi…
go to the bottom ...
Andy
________________________________________
Von: Alex Crickmore <Alex.Crickmore(a)gmgcolor.com>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 7. Februar 2017 15:09
An: Andreas Kraushaar; eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com
Betreff: Re: ECI-EN Digest, Vol 78, Issue 12
Hiya Andreas
Is the remote access available for me to use?
> On 7 Feb 2017, at 13:46, eci-en-request(a)lists.callassoftware.com wrote:
>
> Send ECI-EN mailing list submissions to
> eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.callassoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/eci-en
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> eci-en-request(a)lists.callassoftware.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> eci-en-owner(a)lists.callassoftware.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of ECI-EN digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: eci offset profiles surface finished. (Andreas Kraushaar)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 13:38:25 +0000
> From: Andreas Kraushaar <Kraushaar(a)fogra.org>
> Subject: Re: [ECI-EN] eci offset profiles surface finished.
> To: "eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com"
> <eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com>
> Message-ID: <1486474708233.52624(a)fogra.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi Axel, all,
>
>
> let me all clarify the financing of Fogra since I often hear this kind of "they benefit from a socialism kinda government funding" :-)
>
>
> First we are financed by members and therefore need to stay competitive to keep them and gain more. At the end we have members from the entire food chain (supplier (not the majority), print service providers, repro houses, consultants, print buyers). And that by the way ensures our neutrality ("He who pays the piper, calls the tune.")!
>
>
> Then we apply for research grants on a project by project basis and only get funding if it is scientifically and economical sophisticated (focussing on the contribution of >30 small and medium companies that we need to convince to support that project).
>
>
> Tomorrow for instance the industry interesting in digital printing is meeting in Munich (Agenda, Login for remote access etc: https://www.fogra.org/en/fogra-research/wc-digital-printing/technical-commi…)
>
>
> Here we expect more than 30 attendees (+ remote attendees) from worldwide to discuss the ongoing projects and in particular the new projects. So we provide a platform where the industry can come and say: "Please ask for tax money to solve my problem XXX" to put it very straight.
>
>
> As anyone knows research is never beneficial, we have to do some normal commercial activities to achieve the black zero (such as seminars, control strips, certifications, symposiums etc).
>
>
> So join tomorrow and learn how you can contribute!
>
>
> regards
>
> Andy? Kraushaar
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> Von: eci-en-bounces(a)lists.callassoftware.com <eci-en-bounces(a)lists.callassoftware.com> im Auftrag von Karl Michael Meinecke <KarlMichael.Meinecke(a)online.de>
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 7. Februar 2017 13:41
> An: eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com
> Betreff: Re: [ECI-EN] eci offset profiles surface finished.
>
> Dear Axel, all,
>
> Olaf?s point is most important. Only sustainable co-operation, support and contribution of industry experts provides new standards, applications, profiles. Including the participation of users, printing and prepress companies ? supported by their associations. This worked for many years: Great efforts of a small number of individuals and companies for the benefit of the industry on international level.
>
> I also want to clarify the misunderstanding with respect to the funding of bvdm. There is no public funding of bvdm and it?s regional associacions vdm. The associacions are funded only via membership fees. Second, revenues from activities such as additional consulting sevices and training activities offered to the industry (users, member companies). Members of the associations (vdm) are german printing companies, prepress and postpress companies ? the users in the industry. Bvdm/vdm is the german employers association of the printing and media industries (like UNIIC in France www.com-unic.fr<http://www.com-unic.fr>). The membership is voluntarily. Many companies are not member of the associacion (vdm) ? but are taking advantage of the benefits anyway. This includes e.g. development of professional training, job profiles, curriculae; development and support of standards, technical solutions; economic support and representation (industry policy, regulations, taxes on national a
> nd european level).
>
> The manufacturers of machinery, materials and systems are not funding bvdm/vdm either. They are running their own associacions such as vdma (machinery), vdp (paper), VdL (printing ink). In many cases the manufacturers ? as suppliers of the printing industry (users) ? have different positions e.g. with respect to quality and performance of delivered goods and services. This is in some cases subject of negotiations between bvdm and supplier associacions (agreements or recommendations) ? e.g. the terms for the commissioning of printing presses, prepress and postpress equipment (guidelines, technical criteria, testing procedures).
>
> However, bvdm/vdm and manufacturers associations are co-operating on many topics, e.g. the support and further development of print media, on national and international level. Examples are www.fr.twosides.info/<http://www.fr.twosides.info/> www.printpower.eu/<http://www.printpower.eu/> Probably the most important area of co-operation between bvdm/vdm, manufacturers and other organisations (ECI, Fogra) is the development of technical standards and applications, see above. This is established for many years and the prerequisite for a successful development of technical quality industry standards and application tools (bvdm/ECI/Fogra ?).
>
> Best Regards
> Karl Michael
> (senior consultant at bvdm 1980-2016)
>
> ***
> Karl Michael Meinecke
> E-Mail: karlmichael.meinecke(a)online.de<mailto:karlmichael.meinecke@online.de>
>
> Von: eci-en-bounces(a)lists.callassoftware.com [mailto:eci-en-bounces@lists.callassoftware.com] Im Auftrag von Olaf Dr?mmer
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 7. Februar 2017 12:05
> An: Mailing List [ECI-EN]
> Cc: Olaf Dr?mmer
> Betreff: Re: [ECI-EN] eci offset profiles surface finished.
>
> Hi Axel
>
> I don't think anybody was offended! I just wanted to point out that everybody - including a 'little prepress manager' - has the freedom to decide where to invest his/her resources.This does not mean that it **has to be you** who should invest in the development of the requested new profiles. But it could be you... (or just about anybody else in the industry).
>
> Olaf
>
>
>
> On 07 Feb 2017, at 11:52, Axel Robert <axel.robert(a)ubisoft.com<mailto:axel.robert@ubisoft.com>> wrote:
>
> Hello Olaf,
>
> Apologize I have offended anyone here.
> It was of course not the goal at all.
>
> Nevertheless, I also paid in the past for the French ISO (aka CNTCG) in order to move things forward.
> I was the only big customer and almost no printer was involved too.
> So, I know how it could be difficult in term of personal investment.
>
> The fact is, I?m afraid not to be clever and brilliant enough, to technically participate to the elaboration of this.
> I don?t have your skills. At the risk of repeating myself, I?m just a little prepress manager. ?
>
>
> Regards.
> Axel
>
>
> From: <eci-en-bounces(a)lists.callassoftware.com<mailto:eci-en-bounces@lists.callassoftware.com>> on behalf of Olaf Dr?mmer <olaflist(a)callassoftware.com<mailto:olaflist@callassoftware.com>>
> Reply-To: "eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com<mailto:eci-en@lists.callassoftware.com>" <eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com<mailto:eci-en@lists.callassoftware.com>>
> Date: mardi 7 f?vrier 2017 11:03
> To: "Mailing List [ECI-EN]" <eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com<mailto:eci-en@lists.callassoftware.com>>
> Cc: Olaf Dr?mmer <olaflist(a)callassoftware.com<mailto:olaflist@callassoftware.com>>
> Subject: Re: [ECI-EN] eci offset profiles surface finished.
>
> Hi Axel, hi everyone else on this list,
>
> On 07 Feb 2017, at 10:22, Axel Robert <axel.robert(a)ubisoft.com<mailto:axel.robert@ubisoft.com>> wrote:
>
> But firstly, we are followers, not owners of the new standards.
>
>
> while nobody can be an owner of all the standards that matter to him/her, it is ultimately everybody's own choice whether to become an owner of a certain standard or a driver for the work for and around a standard. Standards are made by ordinary people (who are hardly ever being paid for making standards - rather the opposite: in Germany we have to pay annual fees - on a per person/per committee basis - to be allowed to participate in national and international standardization work) .
>
> While it is true there has been (less and less) government and similar funding for some organizations, and while some leading manufacturers have contributed significantly in the past (and continue to do so), each and every bit of what the group of ECI, Fogra, bdvm, Ifra and Ugra have developed in the last 20 or so years is a mix of contributions also from many 'smaller players' (smaller printing houses, media service providers, ...), all the way down to freelance professionals. In many cases people have mostly invested their personal / private time - quite a few contributors who are employees do their work 'on the side'/as a hobby, and the same is true for freelancers.
>
> The ultimate question is: do you care enough (or do you feel enough pain) to get involved and help take next steps, or not? If there is not enough pain, let's wait until it gets bigger... (or goes away?) ;-)
>
>
> Maybe one day someone looking for improvements/further developments around the standards he/she uses will ask: What is needed to get there? How can I help?
>
>
> Olaf
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ECI-EN mailing list
> ECI-EN(a)lists.callassoftware.com<mailto:ECI-EN@lists.callassoftware.com>
> http://lists.callassoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/eci-en
>
>
Dear Dieter,
I am afraid that most of our printer would not be able to change anything in their own process;
especially with the curves adaptation in their own RIP.
This is, alas, what I too often hear around me.
And I also think it’s not devoted to the ordering customer to do this job. ☺
That is why I would like so much an ECI update.
Anyhow, many thanks for your clever and clear answer.
Regards.
Axel
From: <eci-en-bounces(a)lists.callassoftware.com> on behalf of "Kleeberg, Dieter (bvdm)" <dk(a)bvdm-online.de>
Reply-To: "eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com" <eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com>
Date: lundi 6 février 2017 11:39
To: "eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com" <eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com>
Subject: Re: [ECI-EN] eci offset profiles surface finished.
Dear Axel,
the need to create “v3 laminate profiles” may depend on the common progress in switching to F51 (and F52).
Apart from colorimetric differences, the main difference between F39 and F49/F50 is the epic reduction of TVIs:
F39 --> F49/F50 requires [curve A (40 % + 13 % = 53 % in CMY patches) and curve B (40 % + 16 % = 56 % in K patch)] –10 % = 43 % (CMY) and 46 % (K) by application of film. (Furthermore: –5…7 % by application of UV coat, –2…4 % by application of dispersion coat.)
If you already switched to the new printing conditions with all their changes in M1 measuring mode and D50 lighting, you could try to apply the TVI reductions to the F51 profile:
F51 by application of film would require curve A (40 % + 15,3 % = 55,3 % in CMYK patches)] –10 % = 45,3 % in the 40 % CMYK patches.
It’s not trivial but worth to find out how good the harmonized TVI curves would work with films.
Best regards,
Dieter
Dieter Kleeberg
Referent Technik + Forschung
[id:image001.png@01D0CED7.BA383280]
Bundesverband Druck und Medien e.V. (bvdm)
German Printing and Media Industries Federation (bvdm)
Friedrichstraße 194–199
D-10117 Berlin
Telefon +49 (0) 30 / 20 91 39-164
Mobil +49 (0) 160 / 65 184 60
Telefax +49 (0) 30 / 20 91 39-113
Email: dk(a)bvdm-online.de<mailto:dk@bvdm-online.de>
Internet: www.bvdm-online.de<http://www.bvdm-online.de/>
Folgen Sie uns auf Twitter: http://twitter.com/Der_bvdm
Jetzt vormerken / Jetzt anmelden:
15. – 16. Feb. 2017 Digitaldruck-Kongress 2017<http://www.bvdm-online.de/service/veranstaltungen/digitaldruck-kongress-201…>
Publikationen: www.bvdm-online.de/shop/<http://www.bvdm-online.de/shop/>
ProzessStandard Offsetdruck www.prozess-standard.com<http://www.prozess-standard.com/>
PSO ProcessStandard Offset ISO 12647 www.pso-insider.de<http://www.pso-insider.de/>
R16 roman16 bvdm Reference Images www.roman16.com<http://www.roman16.com/>
CO2 Klimainitiative bvdm - Climate initiative www.klima-druck.de<http://www.klima-druck.de/>
MSD MedienStandard Druck www.bvdm-online.de/fileadmin/tundf/bvdm_Medienstandard_Druck_2016.pdf<http://www.bvdm-online.de/fileadmin/tundf/bvdm_Medienstandard_Druck_2016.pdf>
Von: eci-en-bounces(a)lists.callassoftware.com [mailto:eci-en-bounces@lists.callassoftware.com] Im Auftrag von Axel Robert
Gesendet: Montag, 6. Februar 2017 09:12
An: eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com
Betreff: [ECI-EN] eci offset profiles surface finished.
Wichtigkeit: Hoch
Dear all,
I would like to obtain more information about the following ICC profiles:
PSO_Coated_v2_300_Glossy_laminate_eci.icc
PSO_Coated_v2_300_Matte_laminate_eci.icc
I partially switched from F39 to F51 and F47 to F52.
But I still use the former (aka F49 and F50).
Should I take into account they also will change since the new printing conditions?
Are they still relevant?
Or should they be adapted?
And if so, when or how?
Thank you for your answer.
Regards.
Axel
Axel Robert | Prepress Manager
Ubisoft EMEA |Manufacturing
28, rue Armand Carrel | 93100 Montreuil | France
Tel: +33(0)1 48 18 52 03 | Skype: axelprepress
Hi Juergen,
I’m already aware these modifications.
But nevertheless, thank you for sharing your explanations.
The images are very instructive indeed.
I also prepared some images using the Roman16 too and I noticed there had no big issues between F51 and F49.
But as you wisely mentioned, it could be problematic with the paper tint and the curves differences…
So, I need to be sure to apply the proper strategy.
I don’t want to send an incorrect CYK separation to obtain a final printed job that could be worth than without this adaptation. ☺
Axel
From: <eci-en-bounces(a)lists.callassoftware.com> on behalf of Juergen Seitz <Juergen.Seitz(a)gmgcolor.com>
Reply-To: "eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com" <eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com>
Date: lundi 6 février 2017 14:16
To: "eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com" <eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com>
Subject: Re: [ECI-EN] eci offset profiles surface finished.
Hi Axel,
several changes happened:
-since F51 all reference values are described in M1.
-since F51 the updated ISO12647-2:2013 rules (e.g. new TVI curves) for the process description (and the resulting characterization data) is used.
F49 and F50 are describing laminated Offset prints based on the legacy ISO rules, so they are M0 and the underlying TVI curves are slightly different, just like if you start with F39 and do your lamination on it .
Besides of the many other reference printing conditions, these 2 references for a perfect prediction of laminated F51-products are on the long list.
But: I think that you can still use F49 and F50 to get an estimate of a laminated product, even in front of a F51 production. Maybe after a compensation of the F49 or F50 to the right whitepoint?
The major difference would then just be the changed TVI.
If you compare the variance, you might consider to keep going with F49/50 for the time being.
Have a look at some samples comparing F39, 49, 50 and 51: https://owncloud.gmgcolor.com/owncloud/index.php/s/hRKXdaBdgGjPk23
Based on some F39 data, without any change on the CMYK values, I have just created a preview on how these CMYK values would look like (in Lab), according the different char-datasets.
Open the tifs in Photoshop and go through the 4 Layers on each sample.
If you compare F39 to F51 you will see the most significant change from the papertint and in the quarter tones (have a look at the skintones)
If you compare F39 to either F49 or F50, you can see this much more important impact.
… so I think that even now, F49 and F50 are a good tool to be used, even in front of a F51 production.
Cheers
Juergen
Von: eci-en-bounces(a)lists.callassoftware.com<mailto:eci-en-bounces@lists.callassoftware.com> [mailto:eci-en-bounces@lists.callassoftware.com] Im Auftrag von Axel Robert
Gesendet: Montag, 6. Februar 2017 09:12
An: eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com<mailto:eci-en@lists.callassoftware.com>
Betreff: [ECI-EN] eci offset profiles surface finished.
Priorität: Hoch
Dear all,
I would like to obtain more information about the following ICC profiles:
PSO_Coated_v2_300_Glossy_laminate_eci.icc
PSO_Coated_v2_300_Matte_laminate_eci.icc
I partially switched from F39 to F51 and F47 to F52.
But I still use the former (aka F49 and F50).
Should I take into account they also will change since the new printing conditions?
Are they still relevant?
Or should they be adapted?
And if so, when or how?
Thank you for your answer.
Regards.
Axel
Axel Robert | Prepress Manager
Ubisoft EMEA |Manufacturing
28, rue Armand Carrel | 93100 Montreuil | France
Tel: +33(0)1 48 18 52 03 | Skype: axelprepress
Hi Axel,
several changes happened:
-since F51 all reference values are described in M1.
-since F51 the updated ISO12647-2:2013 rules (e.g. new TVI curves) for the process description (and the resulting characterization data) is used.
F49 and F50 are describing laminated Offset prints based on the legacy ISO rules, so they are M0 and the underlying TVI curves are slightly different, just like if you start with F39 and do your lamination on it .
Besides of the many other reference printing conditions, these 2 references for a perfect prediction of laminated F51-products are on the long list.
But: I think that you can still use F49 and F50 to get an estimate of a laminated product, even in front of a F51 production. Maybe after a compensation of the F49 or F50 to the right whitepoint?
The major difference would then just be the changed TVI.
If you compare the variance, you might consider to keep going with F49/50 for the time being.
Have a look at some samples comparing F39, 49, 50 and 51: https://owncloud.gmgcolor.com/owncloud/index.php/s/hRKXdaBdgGjPk23
Based on some F39 data, without any change on the CMYK values, I have just created a preview on how these CMYK values would look like (in Lab), according the different char-datasets.
Open the tifs in Photoshop and go through the 4 Layers on each sample.
If you compare F39 to F51 you will see the most significant change from the papertint and in the quarter tones (have a look at the skintones)
If you compare F39 to either F49 or F50, you can see this much more important impact.
... so I think that even now, F49 and F50 are a good tool to be used, even in front of a F51 production.
Cheers
Juergen
Von: eci-en-bounces(a)lists.callassoftware.com<mailto:eci-en-bounces@lists.callassoftware.com> [mailto:eci-en-bounces@lists.callassoftware.com] Im Auftrag von Axel Robert
Gesendet: Montag, 6. Februar 2017 09:12
An: eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com<mailto:eci-en@lists.callassoftware.com>
Betreff: [ECI-EN] eci offset profiles surface finished.
Priorität: Hoch
Dear all,
I would like to obtain more information about the following ICC profiles:
PSO_Coated_v2_300_Glossy_laminate_eci.icc
PSO_Coated_v2_300_Matte_laminate_eci.icc
I partially switched from F39 to F51 and F47 to F52.
But I still use the former (aka F49 and F50).
Should I take into account they also will change since the new printing conditions?
Are they still relevant?
Or should they be adapted?
And if so, when or how?
Thank you for your answer.
Regards.
Axel
Axel Robert | Prepress Manager
Ubisoft EMEA |Manufacturing
28, rue Armand Carrel | 93100 Montreuil | France
Tel: +33(0)1 48 18 52 03 | Skype: axelprepress
Hi
I have use the Fogra 39 surface finishing profiles with success for
magazine covers, so would welcome similar profiles based on Fogra 51.
Regards
Paul Sherfield
The Missing Horse Consultancy Ltd
07899 906385
http://www.missinghorsecons.co.uk
Follow us on: Twitter.com/missinghorse
Apple Solutions Expert-Print & Publishing
Member - UK TC130 Technical Advisory Group (ISO 12647 Printing Standards)
Chair - BPIF ISO 12647 certification steering group
Member – UK TAG TC130 for ISO printing standards
UK Representative-ISO TC130- WG13 for printing standards certification
Lean and green?
To save money and become a greener printer, see
http://www.greenprinter.co.ukhttp://www.keeconsultants.com
Reduce your carbon footprint
http://www.1010uk.org
This email and any attachments may be confidential and are intended solely
for the use of addressee. If you are not the intended recipient of this
message, any disclosure, copying or other distribution is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful.
If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and
delete all copies from your system. Email may be susceptible to data
corruption, interception and unauthorised amendment.
We do not accept liability for any such corruption, interception or
amendment or the consequences thereof. We do not accept liability for any
action or inaction by the recipient as a result of advice or information
contained within this email.
-----Original Message-----
From: <eci-en-bounces(a)lists.callassoftware.com> on behalf of
"eci-en-request(a)lists.callassoftware.com"
<eci-en-request(a)lists.callassoftware.com>
Reply-To: <eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com>
Date: Monday, 6 February 2017 at 10:48
To: <eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com>
Subject: ECI-EN Digest, Vol 78, Issue 1
>Send ECI-EN mailing list submissions to
> eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.callassoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/eci-en
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> eci-en-request(a)lists.callassoftware.com
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
> eci-en-owner(a)lists.callassoftware.com
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of ECI-EN digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
> 1. eci offset profiles surface finished. (Axel Robert)
> 2. Re: eci offset profiles surface finished. (Hanno Hoffstadt)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 08:12:26 +0000
>From: Axel Robert <axel.robert(a)ubisoft.com>
>Subject: [ECI-EN] eci offset profiles surface finished.
>To: "eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com"
> <eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com>
>Message-ID: <53041EC0-6198-4D73-93F8-75C0A6125A70(a)ubisoft.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
>Dear all,
>
>I would like to obtain more information about the following ICC profiles:
>PSO_Coated_v2_300_Glossy_laminate_eci.icc
>PSO_Coated_v2_300_Matte_laminate_eci.icc
>
>I partially switched from F39 to F51 and F47 to F52.
>But I still use the former (aka F49 and F50).
>
>Should I take into account they also will change since the new printing
>conditions?
>Are they still relevant?
>Or should they be adapted?
>And if so, when or how?
>
>Thank you for your answer.
>
>Regards.
>Axel
>
>
>Axel Robert | Prepress Manager
>Ubisoft EMEA |Manufacturing
>28, rue Armand Carrel | 93100 Montreuil | France
>Tel: +33(0)1 48 18 52 03 | Skype: axelprepress
>
>
>
Dear all,
I would like to obtain more information about the following ICC profiles:
PSO_Coated_v2_300_Glossy_laminate_eci.icc
PSO_Coated_v2_300_Matte_laminate_eci.icc
I partially switched from F39 to F51 and F47 to F52.
But I still use the former (aka F49 and F50).
Should I take into account they also will change since the new printing conditions?
Are they still relevant?
Or should they be adapted?
And if so, when or how?
Thank you for your answer.
Regards.
Axel
Axel Robert | Prepress Manager
Ubisoft EMEA |Manufacturing
28, rue Armand Carrel | 93100 Montreuil | France
Tel: +33(0)1 48 18 52 03 | Skype: axelprepress
