Thank You Jurgen and Andy, now it's clear.
A more common gray balance definition (C=M=Y, or C>M=Y as G7) could improve the use of eciCMYK from the early stage of graphic projects, but is not mandatory.
-----Original Message-----
From: eci-en-bounces(a)lists.callassoftware.com [mailto:eci-en-bounces@lists.callassoftware.com] On Behalf Of eci-en-request(a)lists.callassoftware.com
Sent: Wednesday, 15 November 2017 9:15 PM
To: eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com
Subject: ECI-EN Digest, Vol 81, Issue 1
Send ECI-EN mailing list submissions to
eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.callassoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/eci-en
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
eci-en-request(a)lists.callassoftware.com
You can reach the person managing the list at
eci-en-owner(a)lists.callassoftware.com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of ECI-EN digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. eciCMYK gray balance (Beltrami, Alessandro)
2. Re: eciCMYK gray balance (Juergen Seitz)
3. Re: eciCMYK gray balance (Andreas Kraushaar)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 12:37:37 +0000
From: "Beltrami, Alessandro" <alessandro.beltrami(a)hp.com>
Subject: [ECI-EN] eciCMYK gray balance
To: "eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com"
<eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com>
Message-ID:
<AT5PR84MB0067F2983B51AD141299E61D95290(a)AT5PR84MB0067.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi All, someone knows the rationale behind the gray balance used in eciCMYK (FOGRA53)?
Converting neutral Lab values to eciCMYK the resulting CMY values are really unbalanced: the M values are really low, that implies an higher TVI on Magenta channel represented on the original FOGRA53 characterization.
Thank You
Hi All, someone knows the rationale behind the gray balance used in eciCMYK (FOGRA53)?
Converting neutral Lab values to eciCMYK the resulting CMY values are really unbalanced: the M values are really low, that implies an higher TVI on Magenta channel represented on the original FOGRA53 characterization.
Thank You