Re: [ECI-EN] ECI-EN Digest, Vol 80, Issue 7
by Pal Bekesy
Hi Sandis,
I do not understand your problem. It's not a big deal generate a device
link profile. There are several softwares with fthis function and it is
about 2 minutes. There is no rule just ECI has to make profiles (free
profiles).
Regards,
Pal Bekesy
Hungary
2017-07-26 12:00 GMT+02:00 <eci-en-request(a)lists.callassoftware.com>:
> Send ECI-EN mailing list submissions to
> eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.callassoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/eci-en
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> eci-en-request(a)lists.callassoftware.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> eci-en-owner(a)lists.callassoftware.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of ECI-EN digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Offset profiles Device Link (Sandis Freimanis|Livonia Print)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 09:30:42 +0300
> From: Sandis Freimanis|Livonia Print
> <sandis.freimanis(a)livoniaprint.lv>
> Subject: [ECI-EN] Offset profiles Device Link
> To: eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com
> Message-ID: <44EFEA2B-FA2C-4337-8590-2CC289C2D0F4(a)livoniaprint.lv>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hi all
>
> Does anybody knows the reason, why there there is no available
> Device Link Profile for public usage for PSO Uncoated Fogra 47_to_PSO
> Uncoated v3 Fogra 52,
> while Device Link Profile for ISO coated v2_to_PSO coated v3 is available
> since 30.09.2015 on
> ECI.org <http://eci.org/> website?
>
> Regards
> Sandis
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: http://lists.callassoftware.com/pipermail/eci-en/
> attachments/20170726/ce7c8434/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> ECI-EN mailing list
> ECI-EN(a)lists.callassoftware.com
> http://lists.callassoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/eci-en
>
> End of ECI-EN Digest, Vol 80, Issue 7
> *************************************
>
6 years, 9 months
- 1
- 0
Uncoated profile total ink
by Tobias Kvant
Dear ECI members,
I was looking at your icc-profile for uncoated paper (PSO Uncoated ISO 12647) and noticed it seems to have a maximum total ink coverage of about 290%. Isn't that way too much for uncoated paper? Every printer I've spoken to agrees 260% should be the limit, or the print will be too dark and dry slowly. Most people using your profiles convert the limit to 260% in their RIP.
Would be interesting to hear your view on this. Thank you.
6 years, 9 months
- 6
- 8
Re: [ECI-EN] Uncoated profile total ink
by Roger Breton
Tobias,
260% is an old, accepted specification for uncoated paper. But many printers
push the maximum to 270, 280 and beyond.
I agree that 290% seems like a lot but it all depends on the image, large
290% subject areas could spell trouble on an older press but smaller 290%
areas would be fine.
It all depends at what densities the printer is printing to, keep in mind.
MfG / Roger
From: eci-en-bounces(a)lists.callassoftware.com
[mailto:eci-en-bounces@lists.callassoftware.com] On Behalf Of Tobias Kvant
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 10:04 AM
To: eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com
Subject: [ECI-EN] Uncoated profile total ink
Dear ECI members,
I was looking at your icc-profile for uncoated paper (PSO Uncoated ISO
12647) and noticed it seems to have a maximum total ink coverage of about
290%. Isn't that way too much for uncoated paper? Every printer I've spoken
to agrees 260% should be the limit, or the print will be too dark and dry
slowly. Most people using your profiles convert the limit to 260% in their
RIP.
Would be interesting to hear your view on this. Thank you.
6 years, 9 months
- 1
- 0