Re: [ECI-EN] Fred15 project - M1 paperwhite for PC1 coated premium
19 Jun
2014
19 Jun
'14
1:42 a.m.
Hello,
With the GRACoL 2013 profile, the proofs made with M1 readings were too
yellow, the proofs made with M0 readings were much better.
I read 11 different papers with M0 and M1 on and i1Pro2. The b* range for
M0 was -2.21 to -6.64 with an average of -3.98. The b* range for M1 was
-3.95 to -9.52 with an average of -6.1
Thanks,
Bret
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 17:19:12 -0400
From: Bret Hesler <bret.hesler(a)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ECI-EN] Fred15 project - M1 paperwhite for PC1 coated
premium
To: eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com
Message-ID:
<
CADCjBLh+p2HrjBo6O_CvJYUEqFCJhMCXzVTS5r-2Bkrz6nV0iA(a)mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hello,
I just got an i1 Pro 2 and will be calibrating a proofer tomorrow to the
Gracol 2013 dataset, which has the same white point and specifies M1. I
took M1 and M0 readings of a couple papers and I agree with your findings.
Sappi Opus is a pretty common sheet, which I have been using as a target
for years, and reads about -4b* in M0 and -6.5b* in M1. After I complete my
profiling tomorrow, I will report back.
Thanks,
Bret Hesler
Attachments:
- attachment.htm (text/html — 1.7 KB)