Thank You Jurgen and Andy, now it's clear.
A more common gray balance definition (C=M=Y, or C>M=Y as G7) could improve the use of
eciCMYK from the early stage of graphic projects, but is not mandatory.
-----Original Message-----
From: eci-en-bounces(a)lists.callassoftware.com
[mailto:eci-en-bounces@lists.callassoftware.com] On Behalf Of
eci-en-request(a)lists.callassoftware.com
Sent: Wednesday, 15 November 2017 9:15 PM
To: eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com
Subject: ECI-EN Digest, Vol 81, Issue 1
Send ECI-EN mailing list submissions to
eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.callassoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/eci-en
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
eci-en-request(a)lists.callassoftware.com
You can reach the person managing the list at
eci-en-owner(a)lists.callassoftware.com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re:
Contents of ECI-EN digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. eciCMYK gray balance (Beltrami, Alessandro)
2. Re: eciCMYK gray balance (Juergen Seitz)
3. Re: eciCMYK gray balance (Andreas Kraushaar)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 12:37:37 +0000
From: "Beltrami, Alessandro" <alessandro.beltrami(a)hp.com>
Subject: [ECI-EN] eciCMYK gray balance
To: "eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com"
<eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com>
Message-ID:
<AT5PR84MB0067F2983B51AD141299E61D95290(a)AT5PR84MB0067.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi All, someone knows the rationale behind the gray balance used in eciCMYK (FOGRA53)?
Converting neutral Lab values to eciCMYK the resulting CMY values are really unbalanced:
the M values are really low, that implies an higher TVI on Magenta channel represented on
the original FOGRA53 characterization.
Thank You