Are you using an M1 measuring device on your proofer?
/ Roger
-----Original Message-----
From: eci-en-bounces(a)lists.callassoftware.com <eci-en-bounces(a)lists.callassoftware.com> On Behalf Of Studio
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 1:02 PM
To: eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com
Subject: Re: [ECI-EN] Fogra51 and 52 looks warmer compared to 39L
No we’re proofing on Fogra 51 and 52 approved paper.
> On 13 Mar 2020, at 16:39, <graxx(a)videotron.ca> <graxx(a)videotron.ca> wrote:
>
> Are you proofing Fogra 51L and 52L on "Fogra approved 39L stock"?
>
> MfG / Roger Breton
> www.graxx.ca
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: eci-en-bounces(a)lists.callassoftware.com <eci-en-bounces(a)lists.callassoftware.com> On Behalf Of Studio
> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 12:04 PM
> To: eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com
> Cc: John Bodkin <john.bodkin(a)dawkinscolour.co.uk>
> Subject: [ECI-EN] Fogra51 and 52 looks warmer compared to 39L
>
> I wonder if you can help me.
>
> We have recently upgraded our Epson proofers and EFI RIP in order to have the facility to produce Fogra certified proofs to 51L and 52L specifications.
>
> Having spent quite a long while creating media profiles for both of these plus 39L, it seems that all Fogra 51 and 52 proofs appear ‘warmer’ than 39L results.
>
> We have been using 39L for many years now and have superb results. Part of our work is fine art photography reproduction, so accurate colour is essential.
>
> When proofing on our Fogra approved 39L stock, the results are as we would expect. Not so with 51 and 52.
>
> We have a viewing booth fitted with the latest generation VeriVide tubes conforming to ISO 3664:2009 conditions.
>
> All proofs we produce pass Fogra certification with very low deltaE values, but 51 and 52 proofs always differ from 39L.
>
> I have had proofs made by a qualified third party and their results mirror ours.
>
> Could you give me any advice as to whether this problem can be resolved?
>
> Yours Faithfully,
>
> John Bodkin
> _______________________________________________
> ECI-EN mailing list
> ECI-EN(a)lists.callassoftware.com
> http://lists.callassoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/eci-en
>
> _______________________________________________
> ECI-EN mailing list
> ECI-EN(a)lists.callassoftware.com
> http://lists.callassoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/eci-en
_______________________________________________
ECI-EN mailing list
ECI-EN(a)lists.callassoftware.com
http://lists.callassoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/eci-en
Are you proofing Fogra 51L and 52L on "Fogra approved 39L stock"?
MfG / Roger Breton
www.graxx.ca
-----Original Message-----
From: eci-en-bounces(a)lists.callassoftware.com <eci-en-bounces(a)lists.callassoftware.com> On Behalf Of Studio
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2020 12:04 PM
To: eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com
Cc: John Bodkin <john.bodkin(a)dawkinscolour.co.uk>
Subject: [ECI-EN] Fogra51 and 52 looks warmer compared to 39L
I wonder if you can help me.
We have recently upgraded our Epson proofers and EFI RIP in order to have the facility to produce Fogra certified proofs to 51L and 52L specifications.
Having spent quite a long while creating media profiles for both of these plus 39L, it seems that all Fogra 51 and 52 proofs appear ‘warmer’ than 39L results.
We have been using 39L for many years now and have superb results. Part of our work is fine art photography reproduction, so accurate colour is essential.
When proofing on our Fogra approved 39L stock, the results are as we would expect. Not so with 51 and 52.
We have a viewing booth fitted with the latest generation VeriVide tubes conforming to ISO 3664:2009 conditions.
All proofs we produce pass Fogra certification with very low deltaE values, but 51 and 52 proofs always differ from 39L.
I have had proofs made by a qualified third party and their results mirror ours.
Could you give me any advice as to whether this problem can be resolved?
Yours Faithfully,
John Bodkin
_______________________________________________
ECI-EN mailing list
ECI-EN(a)lists.callassoftware.com
http://lists.callassoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/eci-en
I wonder if you can help me.
We have recently upgraded our Epson proofers and EFI RIP in order to have the facility to produce Fogra certified proofs to 51L and 52L specifications.
Having spent quite a long while creating media profiles for both of these plus 39L, it seems that all Fogra 51 and 52 proofs appear ‘warmer’ than 39L results.
We have been using 39L for many years now and have superb results. Part of our work is fine art photography reproduction, so accurate colour is essential.
When proofing on our Fogra approved 39L stock, the results are as we would expect. Not so with 51 and 52.
We have a viewing booth fitted with the latest generation VeriVide tubes conforming to ISO 3664:2009 conditions.
All proofs we produce pass Fogra certification with very low deltaE values, but 51 and 52 proofs always differ from 39L.
I have had proofs made by a qualified third party and their results mirror ours.
Could you give me any advice as to whether this problem can be resolved?
Yours Faithfully,
John Bodkin
This is an auto reply message.
I will be traveling from 23rd to 30th Oct and might not have the internet access thus will not be able to response to your email immediately. Will attend reply to your email once I have the internet connection available and thank you for your understanding.
Regards,
--soo chuan
This is an auto reply message.
I will be traveling from 23rd to 30th Oct and might not have the internet access thus will not be able to response to your email immediately. Will attend reply to your email once I have the internet connection available and thank you for your understanding.
Regards,
--soo chuan
This is an auto reply message.
I will be traveling from 23rd to 30th Oct and might not have the internet access thus will not be able to response to your email immediately. Will attend reply to your email once I have the internet connection available and thank you for your understanding.
Regards,
--soo chuan
This is an auto reply message.
I will be traveling from 23rd to 30th Oct and might not have the internet access thus will not be able to response to your email immediately. Will attend reply to your email once I have the internet connection available and thank you for your understanding.
Regards,
--soo chuan
This is an auto reply message.
I will be traveling from 23rd to 30th Oct and might not have the internet access thus will not be able to response to your email immediately. Will attend reply to your email once I have the internet connection available and thank you for your understanding.
Regards,
--soo chuan
This is an auto reply message.
I will be traveling from 23rd to 30th Oct and might not have the internet access thus will not be able to response to your email immediately. Will attend reply to your email once I have the internet connection available and thank you for your understanding.
Regards,
--soo chuan
Dear colleagues,
has anybody of you experience with stochastic screening (preferably
Staccato) and HUV ink? What about TVI - it is uncorrected TVI comparable to
uncorrected TVI at conventional print process?
Thanks for any insight!
Best regards,
Kamil Tresnak
Prague
