Hello
Now that the discussion has reached this point would
you mind
commenting on
these points
(1) Is it taken for granted that some editing of the
conversion side of
the
profile table is necessary to create acceptable
separations
(2) Are industry standards like SWOP and ISO profiles
artificially
corrected
to create desired gray balance, colour saturation and reduce the
difference
between perceptual and colormetric rendering intents
(2) While I appreciate that profile software is
evolving all the time,
but
recently in a direct comparison between GMB and Monaco
I have found
Monaco
to have better saturation ( or suffering less
desaturation particularly
in
perceptual intent)
(3) Does any know if it is possible to take the data
from an ECI2002
measurement file which was created using Gretag MacBeth Measure Tool
And use it to create a profile with Monaco software
ColorThink 2.2 beta from Chromix is the ability to read Monaco Profiler
export and session files and export them in the standard CGATS format
that GretagMacbeth uses. So you can use ColorThink to convert Monaco
Profiler readings for use with GretagMacbeth software. But from GMB to
Monaco, I do not know.
Kind regards,
Kimmo Poikonen
Cmykit