Hi Jan-Peter,
In most professional digital camera's like Canon, Nikon, etc. you can choose the s-RGB
or Adobe Color space.
For print productions most photographers use Adobe RGB.
(this is what I referred to as "camera RGB")
Most photographers that I know shoot in 16 bit camera RAW.
If any fine adjustments to the captured data are needed most of them use the camera
software to make corrections like exposure correction, color temperature etc in the
16-bits RAW files.
If any creative corrections are needed most photographers that I know after file transfer
apply these corrections in Photoshop in the same RGB color space that was used in the
camera: Adobe RGB.
I would be interested to know what the advantage would be of using s-RGB in such a
workflow.
Best regards,
Jo Bruneneberg
eci-en(a)lists.transmedia.de,Internet writes:
Hi James, Hi List
Normaly the Raw Data from Digital Camears or Scanners need some
optimization. This ist best done in well balanced RGB-Workingspace like
AdobeRGB, ECI-RGB or even colormatchRGB
Nobody I know, who is working professional with Digital Images is using
a cemara or scanner profile as working space in Photoshop.
The adavantages are good described in the book real world colormanagement.
:-) Jan-Peter