Re: [ECI-EN] TAC of ISOuncoated profile

So if you got two kind of presses you would tell the customer to make you two different PDFs with different pressprofiles or what? :) Sounds like you just havn't find a good way to convert your PDF's in your workflow.. / Magnus 14 mar 2008 kl. 15.58 skrev Morgan Axelsson: > Like many people say we could do converting in the workflow. > > But I really don't like to do any changes. > I would like my client to use ISO profiles that are set to 260% > uncoated and 300% for coated. (Maybe less because of all the > perfector machines out there 290% coated) > > If I was a designer I don't like the printer shop to modify any of > my files. > So instead of change customer files I rather learn them > how to use the right profiles. > We set up rule how our files should be produce and the customer work > after these rules. We cant get it right from all customer but that > is the main goal. > > To make is easy for customer to use profiles from ECI > Would be that In the profile name it should say web or sheetfed > > Designer like lot´s of ink and in web press you could have higher TAC > than sheetfeed macines > I think ECI need to make new standard profiles like > > WEBPRESS STANDARD > ISOwebcoatedxxx%.icc > ISOwebuncoatedxxx%.icc > > SHEETFEED STANDARD > ISOSheetfeedcoatedxxx%.icc > ISOSheetfeeduncoatedxxx%.icc > > Best Regards > Morgan Axelsson > > > -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- > Från: eci-en-bounces(a)lists.callassoftware.com [mailto:eci-en-bounces@lists.callassoftware.com > ] För eci-en-request(a)lists.callassoftware.com > Skickat: den 14 mars 2008 15:02 > Till: eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com > Ämne: ECI-EN Digest, Vol 25, Issue 14 > > Send ECI-EN mailing list submissions to > eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.callassoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/eci-en > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > eci-en-request(a)lists.callassoftware.com > > You can reach the person managing the list at > eci-en-owner(a)lists.callassoftware.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of ECI-EN digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. TAC of ISOuncoated profile (Jo Brunenberg) > 2. Re: TAC of ISOuncoated profile (Magnus Sandstr?m) > 3. Re: TAC of ISOuncoated profile (Florian S??l) > 4. Re: TAC of ISOuncoated profile (Henk Gianotten) > 5. Re: RGB and CMYK files in a PDF/X-3:2002 file (Jo Brunenberg) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:31:01 +0100 > From: "Jo Brunenberg" <jo.brunenberg(a)rsdb.com> > Subject: [ECI-EN] TAC of ISOuncoated profile > To: eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com > Message-ID: > <fc.000f5799041e7a5c3b9aca008fe1aa05.2b574f6(a)rotonet.rsdb.nl> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Concerning: TAC of ISOuncoated profile > > Following the question of Morgan I have a question as well on this > subject: > > - Is the present TAC value in the ISOuncoated profile (320%) > acceptable for sheetfed offset printers? As Morgan states that it is > too high for his press room I am wondering what are the experiences > of other sheetfed offset printers? > - By the way: We are using a modified version (TAC 240%) of this > profile for web offset. > > Best regards, > Jo Brunenberg > ROTO SMEETS > > > > eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com,Internet writes: >> >> Message: 2 >> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:11:40 +0100 >> From: Morgan Axelsson <morgan.axelsson(a)atta45.se> >> Subject: [ECI-EN] Uncoated paper in Sheetfed enviroment >> To: eci-en(a)lists.callassoftware.com >> Message-ID: <F5356E56-606F-4BDA-878B-0B966260F9BB(a)atta45.se> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" >> >> I dont know were to go >> At our printphop we have Heidelberg sheetfed presses >> Two 8c 70x100 >> One 8c 50x70 >> one 5c 70x100 >> >> We are thinking of changing our colour management workflow into ISO >> standard >> the >> ISOcoated_v2_300_eci Will probebly work fine >> but the >> ISOuncoated >> We have a problem with that profile, it?s set to total ink coverage >> of >> 320% even more than the coated one >> These days we have around 260% of total ink coverage on uncoated >> paper >> in sheetfeed environment >> >> This is a problem we have if we should make it easy for our client to >> start using ISO standard >> >> Do any have any solution or idea for future ISO profiles for sheetfed >> presses >> >> Regards >> Morgan Axelsson > > >