Hi Leonard,
Recollection of what was said and done seems to vary drastically…
just so maybe you (and others) can understand what I mean by 'recollections vary’ - they already vary virtually within hours…:
At 4:12, Leonard says (underlining/bolding by me):
But has anyone modified the tests to comply with ISO 32000-2 yet? If so, whats the point since these files still remain invalid?!?!
At 18:33 on the same day, Leonard says (underlining by me):
if the documentation that accompanies the ATS talked about the fact that there CAN BE differences between implementation and that that IS acceptable – I’d be fine. That is all I have been asking them to do since 2013 when this whole thing began. Why they refuse to change documentation – not the actual files – just the docs – is beyond me.
So either - given today’s date - your statements have been intended to be an April Fool's Day joke to begin with, or you just can’t make up your mind what it actually is you want to say or ask for.
I guess you’ll be able to acknowledge that on such fuzzy grounds it is really difficult to identify any real reasons to revisit whatever aspect of Altona Test Suite v2, especially as nobody else has reported any problem with Altona Test Suite v2 for almost four years.
Olaf