Jyrki,
For both profiles the same characterization data is used (FOGRA27). The difference is in how the actual icc-profile is created.
You can look into a profile using ColorSync-Utility on MacOSX, or compare the two profiles on http://iccview.de/
You will see there is not a big difference. Both have the same whitepoint and the overal shape of the gamut is almost identical.
A comparison of the profiles’ colorimetric intent to FOGRA27 you can see here http://digitalproof.info/profcheck/profcheck5ir1b1.html#
Jeroen Duller
From: Jyrki Kela <jyrki.kela@erweko.fi>
Reply-To: <eci-en@lists.callassoftware.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 12:39:17 +0300
To: <eci-en@lists.callassoftware.com>
Conversation: Difference between profiles
Subject: [ECI-EN] Difference between profiles
Hello list
Can you tell, what is difference between ISOcoated.icc (www.eci.org <http://www.eci.org> ) and Europe ISO Coated FOGRA27 profiles, which came with Adobe Photoshop CS2? It is said in ECI Offset 2004 document "ISOcoated.icc: Paper type 1 and 2, gloss- and matte-coated, 150 lpi (60/cm), FOGRA27L".
Best Regards
------------------------------------------------
Jyrki Kela
Quality and Technology Manager
Erweko Painotuote Oy
Valuraudantie 20, 00700 Helsinki
Finland
Tel. +358 9 7310 2319
Mobile +358 40 7 357 357
http://www.erweko.fi <blocked::http://www.erweko.fi/>
ISO 9001:2000
_______________________________________________
ECI-EN mailing list
ECI-EN@lists.callassoftware.com
http://lists.callassoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/eci-en